Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 February 20243323143

54-56 Kensington, Liverpool, L7 8XB

Planning appeal 3323143 at 54-56 Kensington, Liverpool, L7 8XB (Liverpool City Council) was dismissed on 12 February 2024 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Kensington Field Conservation Area.

change of use of the properties from Houses in Multiple Occupation (Use Class C4) to Houses in Multiple Occupation (Use Class Sui Generis) to form two 8 bedroom HMOs and to retain dormer extensions to the rear, rooflights to the front, replacement windows, and to reinstate original features and enhancements to the front elevations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Townend K
Postcode
L7 8XB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Kensington Field Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for the existing and future occupiers of the properties, with regard to internal living space, outlook, and noise
  • The suitability of the proposed development, having regard to the development plan's approach to the provision of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs)

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the Kensington Field Conservation Area caused by the proposed rear dormer extensions, which would not be outweighed by the public benefits of the front elevation enhancements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HD1Policy H7Policy H8Policy H10Policy H11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

270 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Liverpool City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed6 October 20266010099
    33 Liscard Road, Liverpool, L15 0HH
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266008534
    356 Prescot Road, Liverpool, L13 3AP
  3. Allowed17 August 20266010623
    197 Alderson Road, Liverpool, L15 1HQ
  4. Dismissed17 August 20266009126
    6 Grenadier Drive, Liverpool, L12 4ZN
  5. Dismissed3 July 20266002841
    39 Gresford Avenue, Liverpool, L17 2AN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.