Planning appeal decision
Meadow Cottage School Lane, Higham, ROCHESTER, ME3 7JG
a first-floor rear extension
- Authority
- Gravesham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Chukwujekwu I
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the conditions in dispute are necessary and reasonable (Appeal A)
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development for the purposes of development plan policy and the Framework (Appeal B)
- the effect of the development on openness of the Green Belt (Appeal B)
- the effect of the development upon landscape character and the appearance of the host dwelling (Appeal B)
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the development (Appeal B)
What decided it
Appeal A was allowed because conditions 6 and 7 failed to comply with Framework paragraph 56 requirements for necessity and reasonableness, being duplicative and overly restrictive given the existing removal of permitted development rights; Appeal B was dismissed because the cumulative extensions would constitute disproportionate and inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it.
Framework references: 11, 56, 142, 143, 154, 155
Plan policies cited: Policy C13, Policy CS02, Policy CS12, Policy CS19
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®