Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 March 20243323264

111 Chaul End Road, Caddington, Central Bedfordshire, LU1 4AS

a described as ‘Single & Two Storey Rear Extensions, Two Storey Side Extension, Garage Conversion & Replacing Entire Roof

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Allen K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to local and national policy
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the residents of No 113 Chaul End Road, with particular regard to light and outlook
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and disproportionate additions, combined with harm to openness, character and appearance, and neighbouring amenity, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy HQ1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.