Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld10 December 20243323329

24 Rose Glen, LONDON, NW9 0JS

Hip-to-gable roof extensions with rear dormers, single- storey rear extension, rear outbuilding, alterations to roof of existing garage

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Savage M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters stated in the enforcement notice as constituting a breach of planning control have occurred (ground b)
  • Whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control (ground c)
  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach (ground f)
  • The effect of the appeal scheme on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the appeal scheme on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, having regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The Inspector's finding that the outbuilding and garage together dominate the rear garden and create a sense of enclosure harmful to neighbouring occupants, but that the outbuilding in isolation would not cause such harm, allowing a split decision to grant permission for the outbuilding while refusing the garage.

Plan policies cited: Policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.