Planning appeal decision
Dismissed15 February 20243323336
39-41 Margravine Road, LONDON, W6 8LL
- Authority
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- Appeal type
- other · Section 106 Agreement
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Mileham P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the obligation relating to highway works continues to serve a useful purpose
- if the obligation serves a useful purpose, whether it would serve that purpose equally well if it was modified as proposed
- whether the obligation should continue to have effect without modification
What decided it
The obligation continues to serve a useful purpose in securing a safe pedestrian environment and promoting active travel in accordance with development plan policy, and the proposed modification would not serve that purpose equally well.
Framework references: 116
Plan policies cited: Policy T1, Policy T3, TR12, TR13
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®