Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 February 20243323336

39-41 Margravine Road, LONDON, W6 8LL

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
other · Section 106 Agreement
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Mileham P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the obligation relating to highway works continues to serve a useful purpose
  • if the obligation serves a useful purpose, whether it would serve that purpose equally well if it was modified as proposed
  • whether the obligation should continue to have effect without modification

What decided it

The obligation continues to serve a useful purpose in securing a safe pedestrian environment and promoting active travel in accordance with development plan policy, and the proposed modification would not serve that purpose equally well.

Framework references: 116

Plan policies cited: Policy T1, Policy T3, TR12, TR13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.