Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 February 20243323336

39-41 Margravine Road, London, W6 8LL

Planning appeal 3323336 at 39-41 Margravine Road, London, W6 8LL (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 15 February 2024 by Inspector Mileham P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the obligation relating to highway works continues to serve a useful purpose.

Demolition of existing light industrial buildings (Class B1c) and redevelopment to include erection of three storey building (Blocks A and B) on Margravine Road frontage to provide 2x three bedroom dwellinghouses and part two, part three storey building to rear (Block C) to provide 1x one bedroom and 5x two bedroom self-contained flats with associated landscaping

Appeal type
other · Section 106 Agreement
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Mileham P
Postcode
W6 8LL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the obligation relating to highway works continues to serve a useful purpose
  • if the obligation serves a useful purpose, whether it would serve that purpose equally well if it was modified as proposed
  • whether the obligation should continue to have effect without modification

What decided it

The obligation continues to serve a useful purpose in securing a safe pedestrian environment and promoting active travel in accordance with development plan policy, and the proposed modification would not serve that purpose equally well.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T1Policy T3TR12TR13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 800 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.