Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 December 20233323373

Land South of 70 & 72 Sandy Lane, Bramcote, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG9 3GS

the erection of two dwellings on land off Sandy Lane, Bramcote to enable the removal and eradication of Japanese Knotweed, to create a publicly accessible woodland nature park (to be known as Bramcote Unity Park), extending across all the remaining land in the ownership of the applicant (i.e. all land within the blue line ownership area) and to bring about significant improvements in the biodiversity value of this land

Authority
Broxtowe Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Billings C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the benefits associated with the proposal would outweigh the harm or loss of a Green Infrastructure Asset and Local Wildlife Site

What decided it

The cumulative benefits of the proposal, including Japanese Knotweed removal, biodiversity net gain, and public access to a woodland community park, were not sufficient to outweigh the harm and loss to the Green Infrastructure Asset and Local Wildlife Site caused by the introduction of residential development and domestic use.

Plan policies cited: Policy 16 of the Greater Nottingham, Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough, Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan, Policy 28 of the Broxtowe Borough Council Part 2 Local Plan 2018-2028, Policy 31 of the Broxtowe Borough Council Part 2 Local Plan 2018-2028, Policy 17 of the Greater Nottingham, Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough, Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.