Planning appeal decision
Meadowbank, 17 Skinners Lane, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2NP
Planning appeal 3323386 at Meadowbank, 17 Skinners Lane, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2NP (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 28 May 2024 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal A and Appeal B).
the erection of two detached two storey dwellings with associated access and landscaping following demolition of the existing coach house
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- De Freitas Terceiro P
- Postcode
- KT21 2NP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal A and Appeal B)
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety (Appeal A only)
- whether the proposal would be accessible by transport modes other than the private car (Appeal B only)
What decided it
The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by back-land development at odds with the prevailing pattern of street frontage development outweighs the moderate benefits of housing delivery and other considerations.
the substantial harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits and other considerations, even applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11d) ii of the Framework
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS14 of the Mole Valley Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2009Policy ENV22 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000Policy ENV23 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000Policy AS-H5 of the Ashtead Neighbourhood Forum Neighbourhood Development Plan 2015-2026Policy AS-EN3 of the Ashtead Neighbourhood Forum Neighbourhood Development Plan 2015-2026Policy MOV2 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 226Paragraph 77Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed27 October 20266010634The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
- Dismissed27 October 202660036941 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 October 20266010203High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®