Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 January 20243323570

Oakfields, Quatford, Bridgnorth, WV15 6QL

the erection of a domestic extension

Authority
Shropshire County Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellison H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider area, including the significance of the Quatford Conservation Area
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal fails the disproportionate additions test in NPPF paragraph 154(c) as the existing dwelling's footprint has already almost doubled from its original size through previous extensions, and the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 142, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy CS5, Policy CS6, Policy CS17, Policy MD2, Policy MD13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.