Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 April 20243323745

22 Fairfield, CHRISTCHURCH, BH23 1QX

a single storey, one bedroom dwelling annexe in garden opposite dwelling

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would have an adverse effect on the ecological integrity of the River Avon Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to the provision of internal space

What decided it

The unmitigated adverse effect on the ecological integrity of the River Avon SAC, combined with the unacceptable and significantly harmful effect on character and appearance, meant the development fell within paragraph 11 d) i. of the Framework and could not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

The great weight of adverse impacts (character and appearance harm and unmitigated ecological harm to the River Avon SAC) outweighed the moderate weight of benefits (modest housing contribution, accessible location, sustainable design features), resulting in conflict with the development plan as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 60, 70, 128, 131, 135, 186

Plan policies cited: Policy HE2, Policy H12, Policy ME1, Policy LN1, Policy KS2, Policy CH2, Policy KS11, Policy ME3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.