Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 November 20233323781

37 Gilhams Avenue, BANSTEAD, SM7 1QL

Authority
London Borough of Sutton
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Francis M
Postcode
SM7 1QL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies; and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reasons of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness cannot be clearly outweighed by the personal benefits and other considerations advanced, and therefore very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

Framework references: 149, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy 24, Policy 28

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.