Planning appeal decision
Fairways Cuddington Way, Cheam, Sutton, SM2 7JA
Planning appeal 3334381 at Fairways Cuddington Way, Cheam, Sutton, SM2 7JA (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 16 May 2024 by Inspector Glaister C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework.
Demolition of a part of the existing single storey extension and construction of part two storey extension on the front porch in the front elevation, part two storey extension on both sides and on the rear of the existing single storey extension with dormer windows to the front and the rear of the house and alterations to the existing internal floor plans
- Authority
- London Borough of Sutton
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Glaister C
- Postcode
- SM2 7JA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt by reason of disproportionate additions exceeding the 30% volume threshold, and the harm from inappropriateness is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to constitute very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 of the London PlanPolicy 24 of the Local PlanPolicy 28 of the Local Plan
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Sutton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed27 October 20253366753Rosehill Bowling Club Car Park, Angel Hill, Sutton, SM1 3EH
- Dismissed5 February 20253344545Land to the Rear of 24-25 Telegraph Track , Carshalton , SM5 4AU
- Allowed14 June 20243330511Land at Woodcote Green Garden Centre, Woodmansterne Lane, Wallington, SM6 0SU
- Dismissed21 November 2023332378137 Gilhams Avenue, Banstead, SM7 1QL
- Allowed5 April 20233307784190 Banstead Road, Banstead, SM7 1QG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®