Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld29 November 20233323876

3 Rooks Mead, Thurston, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 3FZ

Planning appeal 3323876 at 3 Rooks Mead, Thurston, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 3FZ (Mid Suffolk District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 29 November 2023 by Inspector Dyer S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.

without planning permission, the erection of a 1.8m close boarded fence adjacent to the highway and the erection of a 1.8m gate and posts

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Dyer S
Postcode
IP31 3FZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • The effect of the development on the use of the access to the site with particular regard to the safety of users of Barrells Road

What decided it

The harmful effect on character and appearance combined with the compromise to highway safety outweighed the appellant's concerns regarding privacy and security for a disabled child.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
GP1H15T10Policy 9 of the Thurston Neighbourhood PlanLP17LP24

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  2. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
  3. Dismissed28 August 20263343778
    Bridge Field Paddock, Green Road, Haughley, Stowmarket, IP14 3RA
  4. Dismissed16 March 20263356460
    Cagmans Farm, High Road, Great Finborough, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 3AP
  5. Notice upheld16 March 20263348273
    Cagmans Farm, High Road, Great Finborough, Suffolk, IP14 3AP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.