Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 September 20243323992

24 Ive Farm Close, London, E10 5HQ

Planning appeal 3323992 at 24 Ive Farm Close, London, E10 5HQ (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 September 2024 by Inspector Livingstone C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the supply of family housing.

demolition of existing house and construction of 3 Nos flats, 1 No 3 bedroom (4 persons) flat, 1 No 2 bedroom (3 persons) Flat, 1 No 1 Bedroom (1 persons) studio flat

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Livingstone C
Postcode
E10 5HQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the supply of family housing
  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants of Flat 3 in regard to internal floor space
  • the effect of the proposal on the safe and efficient operation of the local highway network with regard to parking provision
  • the effect of the proposal on the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The proposal failed to comply with multiple development plan policies, particularly the loss of family housing contrary to Policy 20, inadequate living space for Flat 3 contrary to Policy D6, absence of car-free obligation contrary to Policy 66, and failure to secure the SAC mitigation contribution required by Policy 94.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 1Policy 12Policy 15Policy 19Policy 20Policy 53Policy 56Policy 57Policy 66Policy 94Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

412 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011324
    L/A to 2 Claremont Road, London, E17 5RJ
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011375
    Land to R/O 34-40 Hillcrest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4AP
  3. Allowed21 July 20266006927
    8 Mulberry Close, Chingford, London, E4 8BS
  4. Allowed16 July 20266007500
    38 Second Avenue, Walthamstow, London, E17 9QH
  5. Dismissed22 May 20266003136
    52 Withy Mead, Chingford, Waltham Forest, E4 6JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.