Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 September 20243324049

108 High Street, Odiham, Hampshire, RG29 1LP

Planning appeal 3324049 at 108 High Street, Odiham, Hampshire, RG29 1LP (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 2 September 2024 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building known as 108 High Street or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses.

subdivision of the existing ground floor retail unit into two retail units, change of use of part of the ground floor to C3, subdivision of the existing first floor flat into two flats to provide a total of 2 x retail units and 3 x flats and alterations to two windows to ground floor side

Authority
Hart District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cullen F
Postcode
RG29 1LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building known as 108 High Street or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses

What decided it

The proposal would harmfully erode the historic and architectural integrity of the Grade II listed building and would not preserve its special interest, and the appellant failed to demonstrate clear and convincing justification that the scheme represented the optimum viable use of the asset with harm minimised.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NBE8Policy NBE9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 207Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

52 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed2 September 20243324047
    108 High Street, Odiham, Hampshire, RG29 1LP
  2. Notice varied and upheld28 February 20243318341
    36 Oldfield View, Hartley Wintney, Hook , RG27 8JH
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266011669
    Cedars House, Thackhams Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8JG
  4. Dismissed8 September 20266005123
    Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0NJ
  5. Allowed7 September 20266011109
    16 Cricket Green, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.