Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 April 20243324298

Land adjacent to Hillside House Ashford Hill Road, Headley, THATCHAM, RG19 8AJ

the erection of 2 no. Five-bed dwellings with associated landscaping

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McAndrew R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and area

What decided it

The proposed development would unduly harm the character and appearance of Ashford Hill Road by appearing cramped and incongruous within the established pattern of large dwellings in spacious plots, and this harm was not outweighed by the minimal benefits of the scheme given the adequate housing land supply position.

The harm to character and appearance outweighed the minimal social, economic and environmental benefits (housing contribution, construction jobs, CIL contribution, and biodiversity enhancements), particularly as the Council could demonstrate a 4.6-year housing land supply and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: Policy EM1, Policy EM10, Policy HD1, Policy HD3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.