Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 October 20233324312

3 Highland Road, London, SE19 1DW

Planning appeal 3324312 at 3 Highland Road, London, SE19 1DW (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 4 October 2023 by Inspector Prentis D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

Erection of a part 3 and part 6 storey building (plus lower ground floor) comprising 20 residential units (Use Class C3); provision of associated car and cycle parking, refuse and recycling storage, new landscaping, amenity areas and children's play space (following demolition of existing buildings)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Prentis D
Postcode
SE19 1DW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the historic environment
  • the nature and extent of any economic, social and environmental benefits

What decided it

the less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed Christ Church tower and the Gipsy Hill Conservation Area was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme

the limited weight attached to the economic, social and environmental benefits of the scheme did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building and the conservation area, so the balance tipped against the proposal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP Policy D3LP Policy HC1LLP Policy Q5LLP Policy Q7LLP Policy Q20LLP Policy Q22LLP Policy H9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

323 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed16 October 20266009699
    28 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266007861
    The Park, 56 Elder Road, West Norwood, London, SE27 9ND
  3. Dismissed11 August 20266009353
    62A Upper Tulse Hill, London, SW2 2RW
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266005770
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266005768
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.