Planning appeal decision
67-71 Victoria Road, Romford, London, RM1 2LT
the demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide 9 residential units (C3), including access works, car and cycle parking, refuse storage and amenity space
- Authority
- London Borough of Havering
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Nilsson A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposed development would deliver acceptable living conditions for future occupants with regard to light, outlook and privacy
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants of surrounding residential properties with regard to daylight, sunlight and privacy
What decided it
The significant and unacceptable harm to the living conditions of occupants of no. 1 Corbridge Mews through overshadowing and loss of sunlight to the rear garden, which substantially exceeds the 20% reduction threshold and outweighs the housing and economic benefits even under the tilted balance.
The benefits of housing delivery on previously developed land in a sustainable location and economic contribution were outweighed by the significant and unacceptable harm to the living conditions of existing residents, particularly the substantial loss of sunlight to no. 1 Corbridge Mews, which aligned with Framework policy on amenity standards and attracted greater weight.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan (2021), Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan (2021), Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)
Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney (2018); Bernard Wheatcroft v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®