Planning appeal decision
Sych Farm Adderley Road, Market Drayton, TF9 3SW
Planning appeal 3324562 at Sych Farm Adderley Road, Market Drayton, TF9 3SW (Shropshire County Council) was dismissed on 2 January 2024 by Inspector Cryan M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed scheme, having particular regard to effects on the supply of employment land, and local need for the development.
a two storey 66-bed Care Home for Older People (Use Class C2) and associated outbuildings with associated access and parking, including the demolition of existing buildings
- Authority
- Shropshire County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- community-institutional · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Cryan M
- Postcode
- TF9 3SW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed scheme, having particular regard to effects on the supply of employment land, and local need for the development
- Whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future residents with particular regard to noise disturbance and any mitigation proposed
- Whether or not Sych Farm should be considered a non-designated heritage asset, the effect of the proposed development on the architectural and historic significance of any heritage assets, and whether any harm to or loss of heritage assets would be outweighed by the benefits of the proposed development
What decided it
The cumulative and unresolved conflicts with employment land protection policies, inadequate mitigation of noise for future residents, and unjustified heritage harm meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole.
The moderate weight attributed to the benefits of job creation and care home provision did not outweigh the substantial heritage harm from total loss of the non-designated heritage asset, compounded by unresolved employment land and noise concerns, so the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole and was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS6Policy CS11Policy CS13Policy CS14Policy MD2Policy MD4Policy MD9Policy CS17Policy MD13Policy SP13Policy DP1Proposed Draft Policy DP2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 125Paragraph 195Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Shropshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed10 July 20266005338Land to the Rear of Darby Close, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, SY4 1DN
- Allowed5 May 20266004043Marche Buildings, Unit B2, Marche Lane, Halfway House, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9DE
- Dismissed22 April 20266001790Montgomery Waters, Shrewsbury Road, Church Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6HD
- Allowed30 March 20266003194Hengoed Fields, Upper Hengoed, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7EY
- Allowed17 December 2025600094917 St Marys Road and Wheatland Garage, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6AG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®