Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 July 20266005338

Land to the rear of Darby Close, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, SY4 1DN

outline planning for the erection of up to 26 dwellings

Authority
Shropshire
Appeal type
major · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
SY4 1DN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be appropriately located having regard to the Council's development plan policies and access to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether adequate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers with regard to noise
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety with regard to whether the appeal site can be accessed in a safe and satisfactory manner
  • whether adequate affordable housing provision would be provided

What decided it

The substantial combined harm arising from inappropriate location, significant harm to character and appearance, lack of safe pedestrian access, and failure to secure adequate affordable housing provision significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery, even where the five-year housing land supply cannot be demonstrated.

The substantial harm from location, character and appearance, pedestrian safety and affordable housing provision significantly and demonstrably outweighs the significant benefits of housing delivery and limited social and economic benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 11, 72, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy MD1, Policy CS4, Policy CS5, Policy CS1, Policy CS8, Policy MD3, Policy MD7a, Policy CS9, Policy CS6, Policy CS17, Policy MD2, Policy MD12, Policy MD11, Policy CS11, Policy S16.2, Policy S16.2(iv)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.