Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of Darby Close, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, SY4 1DN
Planning appeal 6005338 at Land to the Rear of Darby Close, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, SY4 1DN (Shropshire) was dismissed on 10 July 2026 by Inspector D Wilson, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be appropriately located having regard to the Council's development plan policies and access to services and facilities.
outline planning for the erection of up to 26 dwellings
- Authority
- Shropshire
- Appeal type
- major · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- D Wilson
- Postcode
- SY4 1DN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be appropriately located having regard to the Council's development plan policies and access to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether adequate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers with regard to noise
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety with regard to whether the appeal site can be accessed in a safe and satisfactory manner
- whether adequate affordable housing provision would be provided
What decided it
The substantial combined harm arising from inappropriate location, significant harm to character and appearance, lack of safe pedestrian access, and failure to secure adequate affordable housing provision significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery, even where the five-year housing land supply cannot be demonstrated.
The substantial harm from location, character and appearance, pedestrian safety and affordable housing provision significantly and demonstrably outweighs the significant benefits of housing delivery and limited social and economic benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy MD1Policy CS4Policy CS5Policy CS1Policy CS8Policy MD3Policy MD7aPolicy CS9Policy CS6Policy CS17Policy MD2Policy MD12Policy MD11Policy CS11Policy S16.2Policy S16.2(iv)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 72Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Shropshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed5 May 20266004043Marche Buildings, Unit B2, Marche Lane, Halfway House, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9DE
- Dismissed22 April 20266001790Montgomery Waters, Shrewsbury Road, Church Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6HD
- Allowed30 March 20266003194Hengoed Fields, Upper Hengoed, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7EY
- Allowed17 December 2025600094917 St Marys Road and Wheatland Garage, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6AG
- Dismissed31 October 20253368229Bodbury Farm, Wheathill, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 6QU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®