Planning appeal decision
Bodbury Farm, Wheathill, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 6QU
Planning appeal 3368229 at Bodbury Farm, Wheathill, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 6QU (Shropshire County Council) was dismissed on 31 October 2025 by Inspector Hughes L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether there is an essential need for a rural worker to live at or near their place of work in the countryside, with particular regard to the functional needs and financial viability of the business, and the availability of other suitable existing accommodation in the area.
agricultural workers dwellinghouse, new access and farm track and all associated works
- Authority
- Shropshire County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hughes L
- Postcode
- WV16 6QU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether there is an essential need for a rural worker to live at or near their place of work in the countryside, with particular regard to the functional needs and financial viability of the business, and the availability of other suitable existing accommodation in the area
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to its location within the Shropshire Hills National Landscape
- the effect of the proposed access track on future large scale farming purposes
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers and businesses with regard to noise and odour
What decided it
The absence of a demonstrated essential functional or financial need for a permanent agricultural workers' dwelling, combined with the harm to the character and appearance of the National Landscape, outweighed the modest benefits of the scheme.
The modest benefits (support for a local food business, rural economy benefits, affordable housing contribution, farm security) did not outweigh the harm to the National Landscape and the conflict with countryside protection policies arising from the absence of an essential need.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS5MD7aMD7CS1CS3CS4CS6CS17MD2MD12S6.2(iv)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Shropshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed10 July 20266005338Land to the Rear of Darby Close, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, SY4 1DN
- Allowed5 May 20266004043Marche Buildings, Unit B2, Marche Lane, Halfway House, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9DE
- Dismissed22 April 20266001790Montgomery Waters, Shrewsbury Road, Church Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6HD
- Allowed30 March 20266003194Hengoed Fields, Upper Hengoed, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7EY
- Allowed17 December 2025600094917 St Marys Road and Wheatland Garage, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6AG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®