Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 November 20233324631

Land at Sondes Place Farm, Westcott Road, Dorking, RH4 3EF

Planning appeal 3324631 at Land at Sondes Place Farm, Westcott Road, Dorking, RH4 3EF (Mole Valley District Council) was allowed on 28 November 2023 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy of the development plan.

an outline application with all matters reserved except principal means of access to the highway for residential development of up to 144 dwellings including the creation of new vehicular access, school parking and drop - off/pick-up, gypsy and traveller pitches (0.2ha), public open space, landscape planting, surface water attenuation and associated infrastructure

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
McGlone A
Postcode
RH4 3EF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy of the development plan
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt, and the purposes of including the land within it
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the countryside and the Surrey Hills National Landscape (SHNL)
  • whether the Council can demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing, public open space, highway improvement schemes, a TRO, a demand responsive bus service, car club vehicles and spaces; and Gypsy and Traveller pitches
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial benefits of market and affordable housing delivery against a significant housing land supply shortfall clearly outweighed the identified Green Belt and other harm, establishing very special circumstances and satisfying the tilted balance.

The substantial weight attached to Green Belt harm and limited harm to spatial strategy and character/appearance were clearly outweighed by very substantial weight given to market and affordable housing delivery plus significant weight to Gypsy and Traveller pitches, biodiversity net gain and economic benefits, so very special circumstances existed and the tilted balance favoured granting permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy CS4Policy CS13Policy CS14Policy CS18Policy ENV4Policy ENV22Policy ENV23Policy MOV2ELP Policy H1ELP Policy DS24ELP Policy S4ELP Policy EN9ELP Policy S1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 49Paragraph 50Paragraph 55Paragraph 57Paragraph 74Paragraph 81Paragraph 111Paragraph 130Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 174Paragraph 176Paragraph 179
Judgments
East Riding of Yorkshire Council v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2021] EWHC 3271 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

80 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed18 September 20266011498
    Woodstock House, Mole Street, Ockley, RH5 5PB
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  5. Dismissed15 September 20266006697
    Woodstock House, Mole Street, Ockley, RH5 5PB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.