Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld22 April 20253324680

Springfield Cottage, Back Lane, Thorpe Salvin, Worksop, S80 3JZ

Planning appeal 3324680 at Springfield Cottage, Back Lane, Thorpe Salvin, Worksop, S80 3JZ (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 22 April 2025 by Inspector Berry A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development is inappropriate development for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework.

Without planning permission, the erection of a detached outbuilding in the position edged blue on the attached plan

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Berry A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development is inappropriate development for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The outbuilding is inappropriate development in the Green Belt that harms openness, and the appellant has not demonstrated very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh this substantial harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS4 of the Rotherham Local Plan Core Strategy 2013-2028Policy SP2 of the Rotherham Local Plan Sites and Policies
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rotherham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011173
    Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
  2. Notice varied and upheld5 August 20263375108
    Land at the Rear of 19 Shelley Road, Herringthorpe, Rotherham, S65 2NF
  3. Notice upheld12 June 20263373896
    Stevenage, West Lane, Aughton, Rotherham, S26 3XS
  4. Dismissed5 June 20266004041
    Land South, Of 83 Newhill Road Battison Lane, Rotherham, S63 6LN
  5. Dismissed1 June 20263356492
    The Barn, The Stables, Common Road, Thorpe Saalvin, Rotherham, S80 3JJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.