Planning appeal decision
91-101 Church Road, Redfield, Bristol, BS5 9JS
Planning appeal 3324936 at 91-101 Church Road, Redfield, Bristol, BS5 9JS (Bristol City Council) was dismissed on 23 November 2023 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would result in a loss of employment uses, and, if so, the factors influencing such.
outline application for the demolition of bu ildings and erection of student accommodation, with access, layout and scale to be considered
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- BS5 9JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would result in a loss of employment uses, and, if so, the factors influencing such
- whether the nature and scale of the use would be appropriate having regard to the character of the area
- the suitability of the transport infrastructure and parking measures to serve the development
- the effects on the character and appearance of the streetscene and surrounding area from the loss of the host building and introduction of the proposed development, with particular regard to its scale and layout
- the effects on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers
- whether the design of the scheme would create an adequate quality of living environment for future occupiers
- whether the proposal would provide adequate contributions towards necessary infrastructure
What decided it
The cumulative and mutually reinforcing harms to highway/parking conditions, character and appearance, neighbour living conditions and future occupier living conditions were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial benefits, even under the tilted balance.
The substantial benefits of student housing delivery (equivalent to c.70 homes) and economic benefits were outweighed by the combined harms to employment use, heritage, character and appearance, neighbour and future occupier living conditions and inadequate infrastructure contributions, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BCS3Policy BCS8Policy BCS10Policy BCS11Policy BCS21Policy DM2Policy DM12Policy DM23Policy DM26Policy DM27Policy DM31
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bristol City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed27 October 20266010371128 Church Road, Bristol, BS5 9HH
- Allowed22 October 20266011341172 Filton Avenue, Filton, Bristol, BS7 0AX
- Dismissed19 October 2026601047046 Berkeley Road, Speedwell, Bristol, BS16 3NB
- Dismissed12 October 202660153491 Kennard Road, St George, BS15 8AA
- Dismissed12 August 20266005564Chasefield House, 888 Fishponds Road, Bristol, BS16 3XB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®