Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 April 20243325055

LAND AT WANDSWORTH BRIDGE ROAD, PALACE AND HURLINGHAM,, LONDON, SW6 2TX

installation of a 17m high slim-line monopole, supporting 6no antennas, 1no wraparound equipment cabinet at the base of the monopole, 2no equipment cabinets, 1no electric meter cabinet and ancillary development thereto

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Major R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effects of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on highway and pedestrian safety
  • the effects of the proposed installation on the potential future development at the neighbouring site at No. 316 Wandsworth Bridge Road
  • the effects of potential future development at the neighbouring site at No. 316 Wandsworth Bridge Road on the signal range of the proposed installation
  • whether any harm identified would be outweighed by the need for the installation and the lack of less harmful alternative sites

What decided it

The lack of suitable and reasonably available less harmful alternative sites to provide the necessary telecommunications coverage in the constrained search area outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance.

Framework references: 115, 118, 119, 121, 123

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D8, London Plan Policy D3, Local Plan Policy DC1, Local Plan Policy DC2, Local Plan Policy DC10, Local Plan Policy T1, Local Plan Policy T3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.