Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20243325353

34 High Street, Marsham, Norwich, NR10 5AE

Planning appeal 3325353 at 34 High Street, Marsham, Norwich, NR10 5AE (Broadland District Council) was dismissed on 18 June 2024 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety with particular regard to the adequacy of access visibility.

a detached chalet bungalow with 2 parking spaces

Authority
Broadland District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moulton E
Postcode
NR10 5AE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety with particular regard to the adequacy of access visibility
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 34 High Street with particular regard to traffic generation, noise and disturbance

What decided it

The inadequate access visibility at the junction, which would create an unacceptable risk of conflict with other users of High Street and adversely affect highway and pedestrian safety, conflicting with Policy TS3.

The modest benefits of providing a self-build dwelling and local economic contribution did not outweigh the significant harm to highway and pedestrian safety caused by inadequate access visibility.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy TS3Policy GC4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 188

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broadland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed19 October 20266008376
    Plough Meadow, Land South Of Hall Road, Alderford, Norwich, NR9 5NQ
  2. Allowed14 October 20266007160
    Land North of Aylsham Road, East of Holt Road (British National Grid Coordinates 615529 (Easting) 325042 (Northing).), Cawston, NR10 4HR
  3. Dismissed4 August 20266008950
    Land at 52 Gordon Avenue, Norwich, NR7 0DP
  4. Dismissed9 July 20266004893
    Land Adjoining Tunstall Road, Halvergate, NR13 3PN
  5. Dismissed2 June 20266005231
    Land Adjacent Four Oaks, Shortthorn Road, Stratton Strawless, Norwich, NR10 5RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.