Planning appeal decision
Nyasaland Crondall Road, Crookham Village, Fleet, GU51 5SU
Planning appeal 3325419 at Nyasaland Crondall Road, Crookham Village, Fleet, GU51 5SU (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 17 November 2023 by Inspector Walker A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is in a suitable location for housing, having regard to the Council's housing strategy.
outline application for the erection of five x four bedroom self-build/custom build dwellings with community allotments, parking and servicing and access to the public highway following removal of existing caravans and demolitio n of existing hut and barns
- Authority
- Hart District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Walker A
- Postcode
- GU51 5SU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is in a suitable location for housing, having regard to the Council's housing strategy
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the development on the provision of affordable homes
- The effect of the development on biodiversity
What decided it
The decisive factor was the significant harm both proposals would cause to the rural character and appearance of the area, compounded for Appeal A by conflict with the Council's housing strategy, lack of affordable housing provision, and unresolved biodiversity harm.
the benefits of self-build housing provision (given reduced weight) and allotments did not outweigh the significant conflict with the housing strategy, harm to character and appearance, lack of affordable housing provision and harm to biodiversity (Appeal A); for Appeal B, no benefits were identified to outweigh the conflict with the housing strategy and harm to character and appearance
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy NBE1Policy SB01Policy H2Policy H1Policy NBE4Policy SD1Policy NBE2Policy NBE9Policy BE01Policy BE02Policy NE02saved Policy GEN1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 80
- Judgments
- Dyer v Dorset CC [1988] 3 WLR 213
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hart
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed2 April 20266003255Land Rear of Horns Farm House, Lower Common, Eversley Hook, RG27 0QU
- Dismissed11 December 20256000536Albion Yard Paddock, Hook Road, Hook, Hampshire, RG29 1EU
- Dismissed4 November 20253363888Amethyst Fields, Crookham Village, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 5SS
- Allowed19 August 20253363555General, Geffreys House, London Road, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9EF
- Dismissed17 January 20243316106Land at the Old Mortuary, Winchfield Court, Pale Lane, Winchfield, RG27 8SP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®