Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 September 20243325610

Land At Lodge Road , Bicknacre, Woodham Ferrers, Essex, CM3 4HL

18 affordable dwellings with public children’s play area and habitat creation

Authority
Chelmsford Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal represents a suitable location for housing, having regard to policies relating to development in Designated Rural Areas, in particular affordable housing
  • The design of the proposal and its effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on designated heritage assets
  • The effect of the proposal on trees
  • The effect of the proposal on protected nature sites

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate a specific local housing need in accordance with Policy DM2(B)(i), combined with significant harm to character and appearance and less than substantial harm to the setting of a listed building, meant the benefits of affordable housing delivery could not outweigh the totality of harm and development plan conflict.

The significant benefit of delivering 18 affordable housing units to address pressing borough-wide need was outweighed by less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building (to which great weight must be given), significant harm to character and appearance, and conflict with the spatial strategy of the development plan safeguarding the countryside.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy S11, Policy DM2, Policy DM8, Policy DM13, Policy DM17, Policy DM23, Policy DM24

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.