Planning appeal decision
Land At Lodge Road , Bicknacre, Woodham Ferrers, Essex, CM3 4HL
Planning appeal 3325610 at Land At Lodge Road , Bicknacre, Woodham Ferrers, Essex, CM3 4HL (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 September 2024 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal represents a suitable location for housing, having regard to policies relating to development in Designated Rural Areas, in particular affordable housing.
18 affordable dwellings with public children’s play area and habitat creation
- Authority
- Chelmsford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Savage K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal represents a suitable location for housing, having regard to policies relating to development in Designated Rural Areas, in particular affordable housing
- The design of the proposal and its effect on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on designated heritage assets
- The effect of the proposal on trees
- The effect of the proposal on protected nature sites
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate a specific local housing need in accordance with Policy DM2(B)(i), combined with significant harm to character and appearance and less than substantial harm to the setting of a listed building, meant the benefits of affordable housing delivery could not outweigh the totality of harm and development plan conflict.
The significant benefit of delivering 18 affordable housing units to address pressing borough-wide need was outweighed by less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building (to which great weight must be given), significant harm to character and appearance, and conflict with the spatial strategy of the development plan safeguarding the countryside.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S11Policy DM2Policy DM8Policy DM13Policy DM17Policy DM23Policy DM24
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chelmsford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 October 2026601463316 Paradise Road, Writtle, Chelmsford, CM1 3HP
- Allowed15 October 20266008937Hawthorns, Broomwood Lane, Ramsden Heath, CM11 1JR
- Dismissed18 September 20266013673Five Gables Cherry Garden Lane, Danbury, Chelmsford, CM3 4QY
- Dismissed15 September 20266006289Land North Of Lyndale, Twitty Fee, Danbury, Chelmsford, CM3 4PG
- Dismissed8 September 20266009587The Meadows (Shopping Centre), High Street, Chelmsford, CM2 6FD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®