Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 July 20243325674

Land south of Taylor Drive, Woodsetts, Rotherham, S81 8SH

the erection of 10 no. semi-detached affordable dwellings

Authority
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the identified affordable housing need in Woodsetts could not be met in the nearby larger settlement of Dinnington, meaning the proposal did not meet the rural exception site test in Policy CS7(c) and constituted inappropriate development in the Green Belt without very special circumstances.

The benefits of affordable housing delivery, economic and social benefits, and biodiversity net gain did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and other identified harm, so very special circumstances did not exist.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy CS7, Policy CS1, Policy CS6, Policy CS4, Policy SP2, Policy CS20, SP33

Judgments cited: R. (on the application of Robb) v South Cambridgeshire DC [2017] EWHC 594 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.