Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20243325998

Land Adjacent to No 55 Bucknalls Drive, Bricket Wood , AL2 3XJ

Planning appeal 3325998 at Land Adjacent to No 55 Bucknalls Drive, Bricket Wood , AL2 3XJ (St Albans City Council) was dismissed on 23 September 2024 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

erection of 12 bungalows. To include 8 detached bungalows and 4 semi-detached bungalows. Access road, parking, refuse provision and landscaping scheme. Provision of access to public footpath

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J
Postcode
AL2 3XJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • the effect of the proposed development on the purposes and openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the Bricket Wood Common Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Bricket Wood Building Research Establishment Local Wildlife Site (LWS)
  • whether the proposed development would provide a safe and suitable access
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not the contributions sought are reasonable and necessary to make the development acceptable
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to the SSSI and LWS, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing provision, such that very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt and significant weight to harm to the SSSI, combined with moderate weight to harm to the LWS and limited weight to highway safety concerns, were not outweighed by the significant weight given to the provision of 12 dwellings (one-third affordable) and significant weight to biodiversity enhancements via offsetting, resulting in the appeal being dismissed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 1Policy 34Policy 39Policy 70Policy 74Policy 106Policy 143B
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 185Paragraph 186
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWCH 2823 (Admin); Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

57 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in St Albans City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted15 September 20263311314
    Land at Former Butterfly World, Miriam Lane, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, AL2 3NY
  2. Dismissed10 July 20266008445
    202 Radlett Road, Frogmore, St Albans, AL2 2EN
  3. Planning permission granted8 July 20263374921
    39 The Broadway, Gustard Wood, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire, AL4 9LW
  4. Notice upheld8 July 20263360007
    39 The Broadway, Wheathampstead, St. Albans, AL4 8LW
  5. Dismissed10 June 20266005367
    Beaumont Hall Lane, Redbourn Road, Redbourn, AL3 6RN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.