Planning appeal decision
Norbryght, Tilburstow Hill Road, South Godstone, RH9 8NA
Planning appeal 3326161 at Norbryght, Tilburstow Hill Road, South Godstone, RH9 8NA (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 14 June 2024 by Inspector Wright A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the demolition of a storage barn and erection of a new dwelling with associated parking and garden area
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wright A
- Postcode
- RH9 8NA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers and its effect on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the site would be a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities and the provisions of the development plan
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that the proposal would not be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with unacceptable living conditions, harm to character and appearance, and unsuitability of location, could not be outweighed by the modest housing supply benefit in the absence of very special circumstances.
The modest weight given to the provision of one additional home and limited weight to economic benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and other identified harms, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP13Policy CSP20Policy CSP18Policy CSP21Policy DP7Policy DP10Policy CSP1Policy DP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®