Planning appeal decision
16 Jersey Crescent, STOKE-ON-TRENT, ST3 4TJ
single storey front extension, single storey and 2 storey rear extension, first floor side extension and extension of dropped kerb and parking to frontage
- Authority
- Stoke-on-Trent City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Marshall E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The impact of the proposal upon the character of the host dwelling and visual amenity of the area
- The residential amenity of neighbouring occupants with regard to outlook
What decided it
The cumulative impact of the proposed extensions, particularly the first floor side extension combined with the enlarged rear extension, would result in overdevelopment that is not subordinate to the host dwelling and would be visually obtrusive and detrimental to both the character of the area and the residential amenity of neighbours.
Framework references: 130
Plan policies cited: CPS1, R15, R22, R23
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®