Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 September 20233326342

16 Jersey Crescent, STOKE-ON-TRENT, ST3 4TJ

single storey front extension, single storey and 2 storey rear extension, first floor side extension and extension of dropped kerb and parking to frontage

Authority
Stoke-on-Trent City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the character of the host dwelling and visual amenity of the area
  • The residential amenity of neighbouring occupants with regard to outlook

What decided it

The cumulative impact of the proposed extensions, particularly the first floor side extension combined with the enlarged rear extension, would result in overdevelopment that is not subordinate to the host dwelling and would be visually obtrusive and detrimental to both the character of the area and the residential amenity of neighbours.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: CPS1, R15, R22, R23

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.