Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 November 20233326351

124 Lupus Street, London, SW1V 4AN

Planning appeal 3326351 at 124 Lupus Street, London, SW1V 4AN (City of Westminster Council) was dismissed on 3 November 2023 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and that of the Pimlico Conservation Area (PCA), and the setting of the Peabody Avenue Conservation Area (PACA).

the provision of a mansard roof, the removal of the front, lower ground floor lightwell steps, the replacement of the lower ground floor lightwell doors beneath the ground floor entrance to match existing, lowering of the floor level within the front vaults and the alteration and addition of windows to the front, rear and side elevations of the dwellinghouse

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
SW1V 4AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and that of the Pimlico Conservation Area (PCA), and the setting of the Peabody Avenue Conservation Area (PACA).

What decided it

The proposed mansard roof extension would appear as an unduly prominent and incongruous addition that would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Pimlico Conservation Area and would cause substantial harm to the appeal dwelling as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset, which outweighs the private benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
PIM3PM4Policy 38Policy 39Policy 40HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 203Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

666 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Westminster Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012339
    1 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266009920
    25 Monmouth Road, London, W2 4UT
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014604
    South Terrace, Third and Fourth Floor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP
  4. Dismissed21 October 20266012002
    Flat B, 9 Durham Terrace, London, W2 5PB
  5. Allowed21 October 20266011405
    17 Bruton Street, London, W1J 6QB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.