Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld14 November 20243326379

245A Acton Lane, Park Royal, London, NW10 7NR

Planning appeal 3326379 at 245A Acton Lane, Park Royal, London, NW10 7NR (Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation) was dismissed on 14 November 2024 by Inspector Hanson S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the use of the premises contributes to the policy objectives of the Park Royal Neighbourhood Centre.

Change of use of the ground floor of the building to a Shisha Lounge (Sui Generis)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Hanson S
Postcode
NW10 7NR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the use of the premises contributes to the policy objectives of the Park Royal Neighbourhood Centre
  • The effect of the change of use on neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to safety, security, noise and disturbance
  • The impact of the use with regard to parking and highway safety

What decided it

The unauthorised use has resulted in significant noise, disturbance, anti-social behaviour and parking problems that harm neighbouring residential amenity and highway safety, and the use does not contribute to the policy objectives of the Park Royal Neighbourhood Centre.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ODPC LP Policy P6ODPC LP Policy TCC2ODPC LP Policy EU5ODPC LP Policy SP9ODPC LP Policy D5ODPC LP Policy TCC10ODPC LP Policy SP7ODPC LP Policy T1London Plan (2021) Policy D1London Plan (2021) Policy D8London Plan (2021) Policy GG1London Plan (2021) Policy HC6London Plan (2021) Policy D13London Plan (2021) Policy D14London Plan (2021) Policy T4London Plan (2021) Policy T6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

423 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266013036
    60 Newark Crescent, Ealing, Park Royal, NW10 7BA
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266013035
    50 Newark Crescent, Ealing, Park Royal, NW10 7BA
  3. Dismissed9 June 20266005485
    36-38 Chase Road, Park Royal, NW10 6QN
  4. Notice varied and upheld18 September 20253354820
    Centre House St. Leonards Road, London, NW10 6ST
  5. Notice upheld17 January 20253328458
    860A Coronation Road, London, NW10 7PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.