Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 June 20243326431

134 Almodington Lane, Earnley, CHICHESTER, West Sussex, PO20 7JR

to build a new single storey dwelling behind an existing dwelling

Authority
Chichester District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Reid J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect that the proposed development would have on the character of the surrounding area
  • the safety and function of the Strategic Road Network (SRN)
  • the integrity of the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area and the Pagham Harbour Special Protection Area (SPAs)

What decided it

The harm to the character of the surrounding area through erosion of rural character and poor relationship to the local pattern of development significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefit of providing a single new dwelling, even under the tilted balance.

the significant harm to character of the surrounding area outweighed the benefit of a new home, even when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole under the tilted balance

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: LP Policy 1, LP Policy 2, LP Policy 9, LP Policy 33, LP Policy 45, LP Policy 48, LP Policy 50, LP Policy 51

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.