Planning appeal decision
Land Rear of 2A Hill Top Avenue, Cheadle Hulme, Cheadle, SK8 7HN
Planning appeal 3326734 at Land Rear of 2A Hill Top Avenue, Cheadle Hulme, Cheadle, SK8 7HN (Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 May 2024 by Inspector Hobbs J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hulme Hall Road/Hill Top Avenue/Swann Lane Conservation Area.
erection of one detached dwelling with creation of new access and demolition of existing attached garage at 2B Hill Top Avenue
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
- Postcode
- SK8 7HN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hulme Hall Road/Hill Top Avenue/Swann Lane Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupants of 2 and 4 Radley Drive and 2A Hill Top Avenue, with particular regard to outlook and the provision of light, and occupants of 2B Hill Top Avenue, with particular regard to privacy
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to the provision of light
- whether a biodiversity net gain (BNG) could be achieved
- whether the proposal would make a suitable contribution toward the provision of open space
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area, combined with the harmful effects on neighbouring living conditions and the failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery where heritage protection policies provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, when considered in combination with other harms, outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery, and heritage protection policies provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework notwithstanding the shortfall in housing land supply
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SIE-1Policy SIE-2Policy SIE-3Policy CS8saved Policy L1.2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed27 October 2026600838115 St Matthews Road, Edgeley, Stockport, SK3 9EZ
- Dismissed16 October 2026601139411 Hyde Road, Stockport, SK6 1QG
- Dismissed15 October 202660148325 Haydock Drive, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 4SJ
- Dismissed15 October 20266010632315-317 London Road, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 4PS
- Dismissed13 October 20266011681111 Bramhall Lane South, Bramhall, Stockport, SK7 2EE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®