Planning appeal decision
Marlian Rowley Lane, Wexham, Bucks, SL3 6PB
Planning appeal 3326781 at Marlian Rowley Lane, Wexham, Bucks, SL3 6PB (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 21 August 2024 by Inspector Phillips A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework).
the material change of use of the Land to a mixed use (sui generis) comprising of agricultural, importation, storage and distribution of primary aggregates, the preparation, storage and distribution of ready-mix concrete and the parking of HGV’s used in connection with the concrete business (the Unauthorised Use). To facilitate the unauthorised use, the carrying out of operational development, comprising of the laying of hardstanding, the erection of gates and fences, the siting of containers, the siting of a fuel tank and the siting of a silo for concrete
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- minerals-waste · Change of use
- Inspector
- Phillips A
- Postcode
- SL3 6PB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is inappropriate development for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including the land within it
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The substantial weight attributed to the harm from inappropriate development and its effect on the openness of the Green Belt was not outweighed by the economic benefit of the business, so very special circumstances were not established.
the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and character/appearance was not clearly outweighed by the economic benefit of the business, so very special circumstances did not exist and the appeal on ground (a) failed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB4Policy GB1Policy EP3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Barvis v SSE [1971] 22 P&CR 710; Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keens [1949] 1 KB 385
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed9 September 20263345670Link Park Heathrow, Thorney Mill Road, West Drayton, UB7 7EZ
- Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
- Notice upheld3 September 20263345455Willow Tree Farm Love Lane, Iver, SL0 9QZ
- Allowed1 September 20263354729The Park, Wexham Road, Slough, Buckinghamshire, SL2 5QR
- Notice varied and upheld26 August 20263376241The Woollets , Cherry Tree Lane, Fulmer, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6JE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®