Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 March 20243327099

100 Tolworth Road, Tolworth, SURBITON, KT6 7SZ

Partial demolition of existing semi-detached dwelling and erection of 6no. dwellings (consisting of 4no. x 1bed and 2no.x 3bed dwellings in 2 blocks)

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether acceptable living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposed development
  • the effect on availability of parking in the surrounding area

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance of the area and the inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, which could not be overcome through planning conditions, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of delivering a modest number of new homes.

the adverse impacts of granting planning permission, comprising significant harm to character and appearance and inadequate living conditions, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery, such that the proposal did not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development

Framework references: 11, 115, 124, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T6 of the London Plan, Policy T6.1 of the London Plan, Policy DM9 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Core Strategy 2012, Policy DM10 of the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Core Strategy 2012

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.