Planning appeal decision
Grove Cottage, 52 Ham Street, Richmond Upon Thames, Ham, TW10 7HT
Planning appeal 3327201 at Grove Cottage, 52 Ham Street, Richmond Upon Thames, Ham, TW10 7HT (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 8 November 2023 by Inspector Parkin A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposals would preserve a Grade II listed building.
ground extension, new first floor window and associated site landscaping
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Parkin A
- Postcode
- TW10 7HT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposals would preserve a Grade II listed building
- The effect of the proposals on the significance of the Ham House Conservation Area
- Whether the proposals would be inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land, having regard to the relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework 2023
- The effect of the proposals on the living conditions of nearby occupiers, with particular regard to outlook
- If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The scale, massing, design and materials of the proposed extensions would fail to preserve Grove Cottage as part of a Grade II listed building and would detract from the setting of Newman House and the character of the conservation area, causing less than substantial harm that is not outweighed by public benefits, and the proposals constitute inappropriate development on MOL with no very special circumstances to justify them.
The harm caused to designated heritage assets (less than substantial harm to the listed building and conservation area) and to Metropolitan Open Land (inappropriate development) substantially outweighs the limited economic, social and environmental benefits of the proposals.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HC1Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP4Policy G3Policy G7Policy LP13Policy LP8Policy C2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 138Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed26 October 2026601187461-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
- Dismissed6 August 20266007949The Lensbury, Broom Road, London, TW11 9NU
- Split Decision10 March 20263333609Pontoon and Land Adjacent to Richmond Bridge Pier, Richmond Riverside, Richmond, TW9 1TH
- Allowed27 January 20266001465The Boathouse, Ranelagh Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1QZ
- Dismissed21 August 2024334571957 Rosecroft Gardens, London, TW2 7PT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®