Planning appeal decision
52 Ham Street , Richmond Upon Thames, London, TW10 7HT
Planning appeal 3327237 at 52 Ham Street , Richmond Upon Thames, London, TW10 7HT (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 8 November 2023 by Inspector Parkin A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposals would preserve a Grade II listed building.
Ground floor extension, new first floor window, first floor rear extension and associated site landscaping (listed building consent appeal)
- Appeal type
- other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Parkin A
- Postcode
- TW10 7HT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposals would preserve a Grade II listed building
- The effect of the proposals on the significance of the Ham House Conservation Area
- Whether the proposals would be inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land, having regard to the relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework 2023
- The effect of the proposals on the living conditions of nearby occupiers, with particular regard to outlook
- If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm caused to designated heritage assets (the listed building, its setting, and the conservation area) and to Metropolitan Open Land would not be outweighed by the limited public benefits, and very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.
The substantial harm to designated heritage assets and to Metropolitan Open Land was not outweighed by the limited economic, social and environmental benefits, and very special circumstances were not established.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HC1 (heritage conservation and growth) of the London Plan 2021Policy G3 (metropolitan open land) of the London Plan 2021Policy LP1 (local character and design quality) of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan 2018Policy LP3 (designated heritage assets) of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan 2018Policy LP4 (non-designated heritage assets) of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan 2018Policy LP8 (amenity and living conditions) of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan 2018Policy LP13 (green belt, metropolitan open land and local green space) of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan 2018Policy C2 of the Ham and Petersham Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033Policy G7 (trees and woodlands) of the London Plan 2021
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 138Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed26 October 2026601187461-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
- Dismissed6 August 20266007949The Lensbury, Broom Road, London, TW11 9NU
- Split Decision10 March 20263333609Pontoon and Land Adjacent to Richmond Bridge Pier, Richmond Riverside, Richmond, TW9 1TH
- Allowed27 January 20266001465The Boathouse, Ranelagh Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1QZ
- Dismissed21 August 2024334571957 Rosecroft Gardens, London, TW2 7PT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®