Planning appeal decision
9-11 Upper Norwich Road, Bournemouth, BH2 5RA
Planning appeal 3327599 at 9-11 Upper Norwich Road, Bournemouth, BH2 5RA (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 28 January 2025 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed loss of commercial floorspace would be acceptable.
described on the application form as, “Demolition of existing buildings and erect a block of flats with associated bin and cycle store”
- Authority
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
- Postcode
- BH2 5RA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposed loss of commercial floorspace would be acceptable
- whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the West Cliff and Poole Hill conservation area
- the effect of the proposed development on the setting and significance of a nearby listed terrace (a Grade II listed building)
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties, with particular regard to outlook, sunlight, daylight, and privacy
- whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to private amenity space, internal space, privacy, outlook, and daylight
- whether the proposed development would adequately cater for cyclists, residential accessibility and refuse collection
- whether the proposed development and nearby properties would be at an unacceptable risk of flooding
What decided it
The combined substantial harm to two designated heritage assets (the conservation area and listed building setting) provided a strong reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework that was not outweighed by the modest housing benefits, particularly given the Council's housing land supply shortfall did not automatically render the relevant development plan policies out-of-date in substance.
The modest benefits of providing 10 residential units and contributing to housing supply (moderate weight) were substantially outweighed by the very substantial weight given to the unacceptable loss of commercial floorspace, substantial combined harm to two designated heritage assets, harm to neighbouring residents' living conditions, inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, and failure to advance equality of opportunity for disabled people.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS27Policy CS21Policy CS39Policy CS41Policy CS7Policy CS2Policy CS4Policy CS6Policy CS18Policy 4.4Policy 6.10Policy D4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 125Paragraph 129Paragraph 216
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 October 20266010210Parkside Guesthouse, 24 Southcote Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3SR
- Allowed22 October 2026601305116 Riverside Lane, Bournemouth, BH6 3LD
- Dismissed19 October 20266005901Flat 5, 11 Alyth Road Talbot Woods, Bournemouth, BH3 7DF
- Dismissed15 October 202660067416 Park Place, Poole, BH14 0LY
- Dismissed14 October 2026601138341 Shillito Road, Poole, BH12 2BW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®