Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 May 20243327603

98 Kensington, Liverpool, L7 8XD

Planning appeal 3327603 at 98 Kensington, Liverpool, L7 8XD (Liverpool City Council) was dismissed on 17 May 2024 by Inspector Bromley N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

Change of use from dwelling house & shop to 2nr. 2- bedroom apartments & shop and 2nr. New mews houses including demolition of existing annex and garage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Bromley N
Postcode
L7 8XD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of 96 Kensington, with particular regard to sunlight, natural light, and outlook
  • whether the proposal provides an acceptable standard of living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to the provision of internal living space and outdoor amenity space
  • whether the proposed development would create an accessible housing scheme with regard to the relevant policies of the development plan

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, and future occupants' living conditions, taken together, drew the scheme into conflict with the development plan with no material considerations to indicate otherwise.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
UD1UD2UD5UD7H13H7H10H12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

270 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Liverpool City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed19 October 20266010482
    Pavement O/S 12 Utting Avenue East, Liverpool, L11 1DQ
  2. Allowed19 October 20266008379
    2 Abdale Road, Norris Green, Liverpool, L11 3EE
  3. Allowed16 October 20266010132
    Surface Car Park & Former Lma - Land at 77-83 & 85-89 Duke Street, Liverpool, L1 5AA
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266012778
    11 Stoneycroft Crescent, Liverpool, L13 6QN
  5. Allowed9 October 20266010480
    Pavement O/S 12 Utting Avenue East, Liverpool, L11 1DQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.