Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 July 20243327743

113a High Street, Odiham, Hampshire, RG29 1LA

Planning appeal 3327743 at 113a High Street, Odiham, Hampshire, RG29 1LA (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 24 July 2024 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on i) the employment use of the site; ii) Odiham High Street as a 'Local Centre'; and iii) the living conditions of neighbours, with regard to privacy.

‘conversion of First floor (and small section of ground floor) into residential property of one bedroom apartment.’

Authority
Hart District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Cullen F
Postcode
RG29 1LA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on i) the employment use of the site; ii) Odiham High Street as a 'Local Centre'; and iii) the living conditions of neighbours, with regard to privacy
  • Whether the proposal would i) preserve the Grade II listed building, 113 High Street or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses; and ii) preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Odiham Conservation Area

What decided it

The absence of sufficient detail in the drawings and specifications to demonstrate that the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building's special interest and significance, combined with the material harm to neighbours' privacy from increased overlooking.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ED2Policy ED6Policy 9Policy NBE9Policy NBE8Saved Policy GEN1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

54 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed8 October 20266011669
    Cedars House, Thackhams Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8JG
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266005123
    Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0NJ
  3. Allowed7 September 20266011109
    16 Cricket Green, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PP
  4. Dismissed3 September 20266004528
    Malthouse Mews, Brew House Lane, Hartley Wintney, RG27 8QA
  5. Allowed1 September 20266011801
    Esso Petrol Station, Hook Road, North Warnborough, RG29 1EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.