Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 May 20243327770

Land to the South of East Street Farm, East Street, Ash, Kent, CT3 2DA

demolition of existing storage buildings and the erection of two detached dwellings with associated parking

Authority
Dover District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to relevant local and national policies

What decided it

The site's location well outside the settlement boundary of Ash, not adjoining it as required by emerging policy, combined with the unsustainability of the location for car-dependent travel, means the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

The modest benefits of adding to housing supply, removing a lawful commercial storage use, and environmental and economic gains from construction were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of locating residential development outside the settlement boundary contrary to the development plan and emerging policy, and contrary to sustainable transport principles

Framework references: 11, 48, 84, 124

Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy DM11, Policy ANP1, Draft Policy SP4

Judgments cited: Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.