Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 December 20233327779

89 Gills Hill Lane, Radlett, WD7 8PD

part single, part two storey front, side and rear extensions with integral garage following removal of side extension, construction of garden room to rear of garden, insertion of rooflight to front and loft conversion with associated dormer to rear

Authority
Hertsmere Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Benson E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed part single, part two-storey front extensions on the character and appearance of the host property, the semi-detached pair and the surrounding area

What decided it

The significant increase in bulk and mass of the front extensions would harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling and semi-detached pair, and would be visually intrusive and dominating in the street scene.

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy CS22, Policy CS25, Policy SADM30, Policy SADM40, Policy HD3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.