Planning appeal decision
Tesco, 171-175 Gloucester Road, Bishopston, Bristol, BS7 8BE
Planning appeal 3327804 at Tesco, 171-175 Gloucester Road, Bishopston, Bristol, BS7 8BE (Bristol City Council) was dismissed on 2 June 2025 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of the Gloucester Road Town Centre.
Erection of 9no. self-contained flats (Use Class C3) with access, and associated cycle parking and bin storage
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- BS7 8BE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of the Gloucester Road Town Centre
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Gloucester Road Conservation Area
- the effect on trees
- the effect on biodiversity
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing and future neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, overshadowing and overbearing effects
- whether the proposal provides satisfactory living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to internal space
What decided it
The substantial and cumulative harms to retail viability, conservation area character and appearance, trees, biodiversity and neighbouring living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery and effective land use, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
The benefits of nine new homes, effective use of brownfield land, socio-economic benefits and CO2 emissions performance (significant weight) and the less-than-substantial harm to the heritage asset (which would be outweighed by these benefits under paragraph 215 of the Framework) were outweighed by the substantial harms to retail viability, character and appearance, trees, biodiversity and neighbouring living conditions, resulting in the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BCS7Policy BCS9Policy BCS18Policy BCS21Policy BCS22Policy DM8Policy DM14Policy DM15Policy DM17Policy DM19Policy DM26Policy DM27Policy DM29Policy DM30Policy DM31
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bristol City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed27 October 20266010371128 Church Road, Bristol, BS5 9HH
- Allowed22 October 20266011341172 Filton Avenue, Filton, Bristol, BS7 0AX
- Dismissed19 October 2026601047046 Berkeley Road, Speedwell, Bristol, BS16 3NB
- Dismissed12 October 20266015419Gloucester Road Service Station, 410 - 424 Gloucester Road, Horfield, Bristol, BS7 8TX
- Dismissed12 October 202660153491 Kennard Road, St George, BS15 8AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®