Planning appeal decision
Land Rear Of 189 To 207 And 189 Waldegrave Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8LX
Planning appeal 3328268 at Land Rear Of 189 To 207 And 189 Waldegrave Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8LX (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 3 September 2024 by Inspector Aqbal M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would result in the unjustified loss of employment land.
change of use and alterations to no.189 Waldegrave Road to create one ground floor commercial unit and 3 no. one-bedroom residential apartments; creation of a disabled car parking space on the Waldegrave Road frontage; demolition of all existing buildings at the rear of no. 189-207 Waldegrave Road and the erection of two residential blocks (one two-storey and a part two, part three-storey building) comprising 15 no. residential apartments (8 x one bedroom and 7 x two-bedroom); erection of cycle storage and recycling structure; landscaping
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Aqbal M
- Postcode
- TW11 8LX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would result in the unjustified loss of employment land
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on car parking and highway safety
- Whether the proposal makes acceptable provision for affordable housing
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbours
- The effect of the proposal on a nearby tree
- Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for drainage
- Whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for fire safety
- Whether the proposal meets the Council's requirements for carbon reduction, water saving and energy efficiency
What decided it
The proposal fails to justify the loss of employment land through robust marketing evidence, fails to secure affordable housing through a legal agreement, and would cause unacceptable overlooking and loss of sunlight to neighbouring properties, with these three areas of development plan conflict not outweighed by the housing benefits and sustainability measures.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LP Policy LP 25LP Policy LP 26London Plan Policy E1LP Policy LP 41LP Policy LP 42London Plan Policy E7LP Policy LP 39LP Policy LP 1London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy T6LP Policy LP 45LP Policy LP 44London Plan Policy H4LP Policy LP 36LP Policy LP 30LP Policy LP 8LP Policy LP 16London Plan Policy SI 13LP Policy LP 21London Plan Policy D12London Plan Policy D5LP Policy LP 22LP Policy LP 20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 128
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed20 October 20266010388163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
- Dismissed1 October 202660073901-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
- Dismissed22 July 20266003237Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
- Dismissed14 July 2026600449259-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
- Dismissed7 July 2026601018469 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®