Planning appeal decision
17-21 Meadway House , Brighton Road, Surbiton, KT6 5LR
Planning appeal 3328319 at 17-21 Meadway House , Brighton Road, Surbiton, KT6 5LR (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 26 June 2024 by Inspector Major R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to internal and external communal living space, privacy, outlook, daylight and sunlight.
change of use of part of the ground floor, part of the first floor and the second floor of Meadway House from vacant commercial floorspace (Class E) to a large House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) with a total of 11 rooms and a maximum occupancy of 11 persons (Use Class Sui Generis) with associated external alterations
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Major R
- Postcode
- KT6 5LR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to internal and external communal living space, privacy, outlook, daylight and sunlight
- whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for cycle parking
- the effect of the proposed development on pedestrian and highway safety, with regard to car parking and congestion
What decided it
The failure to provide acceptable living conditions for occupiers of two bedrooms and the failure to provide required cycle parking facilities would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the housing supply benefits when assessed against the Framework.
The adverse impacts of inadequate living conditions for future occupiers and insufficient cycle parking facilities would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of providing 6 residential units and economic benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)Policy T5 of the London PlanPolicy T6 of the London PlanPolicy DM6 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM8 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM9 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM10 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM13 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 57Paragraph 115Paragraph 225
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed7 October 2026601191211 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
- Dismissed29 September 2026600998856 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
- Dismissed25 September 2026600907674 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
- Allowed11 August 20266010924271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
- Dismissed3 August 20266007703Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®