Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 June 20243328319

17-21 Meadway House , Brighton Road, Surbiton, KT6 5LR

Planning appeal 3328319 at 17-21 Meadway House , Brighton Road, Surbiton, KT6 5LR (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 26 June 2024 by Inspector Major R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to internal and external communal living space, privacy, outlook, daylight and sunlight.

change of use of part of the ground floor, part of the first floor and the second floor of Meadway House from vacant commercial floorspace (Class E) to a large House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) with a total of 11 rooms and a maximum occupancy of 11 persons (Use Class Sui Generis) with associated external alterations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Major R
Postcode
KT6 5LR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to internal and external communal living space, privacy, outlook, daylight and sunlight
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for cycle parking
  • the effect of the proposed development on pedestrian and highway safety, with regard to car parking and congestion

What decided it

The failure to provide acceptable living conditions for occupiers of two bedrooms and the failure to provide required cycle parking facilities would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the housing supply benefits when assessed against the Framework.

The adverse impacts of inadequate living conditions for future occupiers and insufficient cycle parking facilities would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of providing 6 residential units and economic benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)Policy T5 of the London PlanPolicy T6 of the London PlanPolicy DM6 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM8 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM9 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM10 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM13 of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57Paragraph 115Paragraph 225
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

339 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266009988
    56 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
  3. Dismissed25 September 20266009076
    74 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
  4. Allowed11 August 20266010924
    271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
  5. Dismissed3 August 20266007703
    Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.