Planning appeal decision
Fourells Paddock, Richings Way, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9DE
Planning appeal 3328366 at Fourells Paddock, Richings Way, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL0 9DE (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was allowed on 15 February 2024 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
outline planning application for the demolition of existing residential properties and equestrian buildings to facilitate the construction of up to 30 dwellings to include 40% affordable housing provision with First Homes, up to 2 self- build plots, public open space and associated infrastructure and landscaping. All matters to be reserved except for the creation of new site access
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- SL0 9DE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- if relevant, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The chronic and worsening five-year housing land supply shortfall (1.3 years), combined with the delivery of affordable housing and other benefits, was found to clearly outweigh the Green Belt and other harms and constitute the very special circumstances justifying the development.
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with less than substantial heritage harm and minor character and appearance harm, was clearly outweighed by the substantial weight attached to the housing land supply shortfall and significant weight given to affordable housing, together with modest/limited weight given to self-build, public open space, biodiversity net gain and economic benefits, amounting to very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1 of the South Bucks District Local PlanCore Strategy Policy CP2Core Strategy Policy CP3Core Strategy Policy CP5Local Plan Policy H9Core Strategy Policies CP9 and CP13Policy IV7 of the Ivers Neighbourhood PlanPolicies IV8, IV14 and IV15 of the Ivers Neighbourhood Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
- Notice varied and upheld8 July 20263347247Small Acres Farm, Stoke Common Road, Fulmer , Buckinghamshire , SL3 6HA
- Allowed29 May 20263376692Boveney Court Farm Boveney Road, Dorney, Windsor, Buckinghamshire , SL4 6QG
- Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263376465Land at Denham Mount Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW
- Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263364195Denham Mount, Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®