Planning appeal decision
262 Bramhall Lane South, Bramhall, STOCKPORT, SK7 3DG
erection of a dwelling
- Authority
- Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Veevers A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Bramhall Park Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposed development on the significance of Ladybrook House as a non-designated heritage asset
- the effect of the proposal on the landscape character of the area
- whether the proposal would make adequate provision for recreation and amenity open space arising from the occupation of the proposed development having regard to local development plan policy requirements
What decided it
The public benefits of delivering one home in a location with good accessibility to services, combined with highway safety improvements and ecological benefits, outweighed the low level of less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area character and appearance.
The less-than-substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Bramhall Park Conservation Area (at the lower end of the spectrum) was outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery addressing the five-year supply shortfall, highway safety improvements, and ecological benefits, applying the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11.
Framework references: 11, 57, 208, 209
Plan policies cited: Policy CS8, Policy SIE1, Policy SIE3, Policy HC1.3, Policy L1.2, Policy SIE2, Policy LCR1.1, Policy LCR1.1a, Policy H.1
Judgments cited: Grampian Regional Council v Aberdeen CC [1983] P&CR 633; Bellway Homes Ltd v SSCLG & Cheshire East Council CO/302/2015; Engbers v SSCLG [2016] EWCA Civ 118
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®