Planning appeal decision
Land Between Huntingdon Road and Cambridge Road, Cambridge, CB4 3NA
Planning appeal 3328390 at Land Between Huntingdon Road and Cambridge Road, Cambridge, CB4 3NA (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was allowed on 26 June 2024 by Inspector Barrett R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the appeal proposal on the demand for potable water use, associated abstraction and the associated risk of deterioration to waterbodies in the Greater Cambridge area.
Outline planning permission (all matters reserved except for means of access) for up to 1,000 residential dwellings, secondary school, primary school, community facilities, retail uses, open space and landscaped areas, associated engineering, demolition and infrastructure works
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Barrett R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the appeal proposal on the demand for potable water use, associated abstraction and the associated risk of deterioration to waterbodies in the Greater Cambridge area.
What decided it
The Secretary of State's conclusion, agreeing with the Inspector, that the appeal development would not adversely affect the demand for potable water or associated abstraction and would not risk deterioration to waterbodies, thereby resolving the Environment Agency's outstanding objection.
the substantial benefits of the scheme (housing delivery including 40% affordable housing, economic benefits, community facilities, sports/open space and a Country Park, effective use of land, biodiversity net gain, and support for active travel) were given substantial weight and outweighed the limited weight given to harm to non-designated heritage assets, with the proposal found to accord with the development plan overall
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS/2Policy CC/4Policy CC/7Policy NH/4Policy NH/14Policy S/2Policy S/3Policy S/4Policy S/5Policy S/6Policy CC/1Policy CC/3Policy CC/5Policy CC/6Policy CC/8Policy CC/9Policy HQ/1Policy HQ/2Policy NH/2Policy NH/3Policy NH/5Policy NH/6Policy NH/8Policy NH/10Policy H/8Policy H/9Policy H/10Policy H/12Policy E/22Policy SC/2Policy SC/4Policy SC/6Policy SC/7Policy SC/9Policy SC/10Policy SC/11Policy SC/12Policy SC/14Policy TI/2Policy TI/3Policy TI/8Policy TI/9Policy TI/10Policy 5 (Minerals and Waste Local Plan)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 20Paragraph 48Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 179Paragraph 180Paragraph 186Paragraph 194Paragraph 209
- Judgments
- R (An Taisce (National Trust For Ireland)) v SSECC [2014] EWCA Civ 1111; [2015] PTSR 189; R (Together Against Sizewell C) v SSESNZ [2023] EWHC 1526 (Admin); Gateshead MBC v Secretary of State for the Environment [1995] Env LR 37, [1994] 1 PLR 8515; Case C-461/13 Bund für Umwelt
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Cambridgeshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed23 October 20266005101Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266010417Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
- Dismissed19 October 2026600863119 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
- Dismissed16 October 20266011793Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
- Dismissed2 October 20266011365Land Adjacent to North Grove, Long Lane, Fowlmere, SG8 7TG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®